<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Open source users aren&#8217;t your average beta testers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stormyscorner.com/2008/08/open-source-users-arent-your-average-beta-testers.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stormyscorner.com/2008/08/open-source-users-arent-your-average-beta-testers.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 12:13:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: stormy</title>
		<link>http://stormyscorner.com/2008/08/open-source-users-arent-your-average-beta-testers.html/comment-page-1#comment-1200</link>
		<dc:creator>stormy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 16:04:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stormyscorner.com/2008/08/open-source-users-arent-your-average-beta-testers.html#comment-1200</guid>
		<description>test
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>test</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mårten Woxberg</title>
		<link>http://stormyscorner.com/2008/08/open-source-users-arent-your-average-beta-testers.html/comment-page-1#comment-1199</link>
		<dc:creator>Mårten Woxberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 12:16:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stormyscorner.com/2008/08/open-source-users-arent-your-average-beta-testers.html#comment-1199</guid>
		<description>Could you reverse the order in which the &quot;Posted by:&quot; arrives?
Right now I read it as Graham Todd has posted &quot;then why does Apple...&quot; but it&#039;s really triton... consider this a bugreport.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could you reverse the order in which the &#8220;Posted by:&#8221; arrives?<br />
Right now I read it as Graham Todd has posted &#8220;then why does Apple&#8230;&#8221; but it&#8217;s really triton&#8230; consider this a bugreport.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: triton</title>
		<link>http://stormyscorner.com/2008/08/open-source-users-arent-your-average-beta-testers.html/comment-page-1#comment-1198</link>
		<dc:creator>triton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 12:13:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stormyscorner.com/2008/08/open-source-users-arent-your-average-beta-testers.html#comment-1198</guid>
		<description>then why does Apple release highly-polished software while the free software community only ships buggy, unpolished software?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>then why does Apple release highly-polished software while the free software community only ships buggy, unpolished software?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graham Todd</title>
		<link>http://stormyscorner.com/2008/08/open-source-users-arent-your-average-beta-testers.html/comment-page-1#comment-1197</link>
		<dc:creator>Graham Todd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 11:48:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stormyscorner.com/2008/08/open-source-users-arent-your-average-beta-testers.html#comment-1197</guid>
		<description>You and Scoble have excellent points to make here. Well said.
It is still difficult to translate these kinds of advantages into a case for adoption of open source tools in organizations where somewhat rigid and circumscribed compliance testing still rules the official &quot;acceptance process&quot;.
I think some good ol&#039; marketing language that melts the hearts of hidebound &quot;IT Managers&quot; is whats required. The same way not &quot;wearing a suit&quot; was Apple&#039;s badge of legitimacy in the &quot;switch&quot; campaign, there&#039;s got to be some easy to grok hook for open source.
Cheers.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You and Scoble have excellent points to make here. Well said.<br />
It is still difficult to translate these kinds of advantages into a case for adoption of open source tools in organizations where somewhat rigid and circumscribed compliance testing still rules the official &#8220;acceptance process&#8221;.<br />
I think some good ol&#8217; marketing language that melts the hearts of hidebound &#8220;IT Managers&#8221; is whats required. The same way not &#8220;wearing a suit&#8221; was Apple&#8217;s badge of legitimacy in the &#8220;switch&#8221; campaign, there&#8217;s got to be some easy to grok hook for open source.<br />
Cheers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: S. Nilesh</title>
		<link>http://stormyscorner.com/2008/08/open-source-users-arent-your-average-beta-testers.html/comment-page-1#comment-1196</link>
		<dc:creator>S. Nilesh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 11:21:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stormyscorner.com/2008/08/open-source-users-arent-your-average-beta-testers.html#comment-1196</guid>
		<description>What do you exactly want to say ? .. that Open Source Software is inefficient and full of bugs ? or the opposite ??
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do you exactly want to say ? .. that Open Source Software is inefficient and full of bugs ? or the opposite ??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

