<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It&#8217;s now easier than ever to do what everyone else is doing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stormyscorner.com/2008/12/its-now-easier-than-ever-to-do-what-everyone-else-is-doing.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stormyscorner.com/2008/12/its-now-easier-than-ever-to-do-what-everyone-else-is-doing.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 13:54:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David King</title>
		<link>http://stormyscorner.com/2008/12/its-now-easier-than-ever-to-do-what-everyone-else-is-doing.html/comment-page-1#comment-961</link>
		<dc:creator>David King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 09:50:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stormyscorner.com/2008/12/its-now-easier-than-ever-to-do-what-everyone-else-is-doing.html#comment-961</guid>
		<description>Stormy, for a good and cheap lens in EF mount, I would go for the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.adorama.com/CA5018AFU.html&quot; title=&quot;EF 50mm 1.8 at Adorama&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;EF 50mm f/1.8&lt;/a&gt;. It&#039;s all plastic and doesn&#039;t have nice USM focusing, but the wide aperture is great for low light, and optically it is pretty good. I have never used it, but have several friends who are pretty happy with it. Inexpensive too!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stormy, for a good and cheap lens in EF mount, I would go for the <a href="http://www.adorama.com/CA5018AFU.html" title="EF 50mm 1.8 at Adorama" rel="nofollow">EF 50mm f/1.8</a>. It&#8217;s all plastic and doesn&#8217;t have nice USM focusing, but the wide aperture is great for low light, and optically it is pretty good. I have never used it, but have several friends who are pretty happy with it. Inexpensive too!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce Cowan</title>
		<link>http://stormyscorner.com/2008/12/its-now-easier-than-ever-to-do-what-everyone-else-is-doing.html/comment-page-1#comment-960</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce Cowan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 15:05:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stormyscorner.com/2008/12/its-now-easier-than-ever-to-do-what-everyone-else-is-doing.html#comment-960</guid>
		<description>The only snag with this feature is they insist on using the American names for cameras, which confuse me.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only snag with this feature is they insist on using the American names for cameras, which confuse me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce Cowan</title>
		<link>http://stormyscorner.com/2008/12/its-now-easier-than-ever-to-do-what-everyone-else-is-doing.html/comment-page-1#comment-959</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce Cowan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 15:05:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stormyscorner.com/2008/12/its-now-easier-than-ever-to-do-what-everyone-else-is-doing.html#comment-959</guid>
		<description>The only snag with this feature is they insist on using the American names for cameras, which confuse me.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only snag with this feature is they insist on using the American names for cameras, which confuse me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stormy</title>
		<link>http://stormyscorner.com/2008/12/its-now-easier-than-ever-to-do-what-everyone-else-is-doing.html/comment-page-1#comment-958</link>
		<dc:creator>Stormy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 11:31:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stormyscorner.com/2008/12/its-now-easier-than-ever-to-do-what-everyone-else-is-doing.html#comment-958</guid>
		<description>Erick,
I&#039;ve noticed the flash doesn&#039;t behave like I think it should. Didn&#039;t know if that was the camera or me since I don&#039;t know much about cameras beyond point and shoot yet.
That said, I don&#039;t like flash photography so I&#039;m looking for a lens that will let me take good low light pictures ... when I&#039;m willing to spend the money!
Our main reason for getting a digital SLR was to be able to take pictures of the kids moving. And those pictures are usually outside.
Stormy
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Erick,<br />
I&#8217;ve noticed the flash doesn&#8217;t behave like I think it should. Didn&#8217;t know if that was the camera or me since I don&#8217;t know much about cameras beyond point and shoot yet.<br />
That said, I don&#8217;t like flash photography so I&#8217;m looking for a lens that will let me take good low light pictures &#8230; when I&#8217;m willing to spend the money!<br />
Our main reason for getting a digital SLR was to be able to take pictures of the kids moving. And those pictures are usually outside.<br />
Stormy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erick</title>
		<link>http://stormyscorner.com/2008/12/its-now-easier-than-ever-to-do-what-everyone-else-is-doing.html/comment-page-1#comment-957</link>
		<dc:creator>Erick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 11:05:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stormyscorner.com/2008/12/its-now-easier-than-ever-to-do-what-everyone-else-is-doing.html#comment-957</guid>
		<description>If you had posted about it before the purchase, I would have told you I am a long-time Canon buyer.  I currently have the XTi and I hate it.  The flash metering in the original Digital Rebel was less than adequate, but it makes the XTi look very bad.  The XTi is a piece of junk.  Search google for &quot;Digital Rebel flash metering&quot;.  You can offset the problems with a good flash unit, but don&#039;t go cheap on it.  My next camera will probably be a Nikon D90.
Good luck with yours, I hope you like it.  If you take outdoor photos, it will be fine.  Indoor, you will be left wanting.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you had posted about it before the purchase, I would have told you I am a long-time Canon buyer.  I currently have the XTi and I hate it.  The flash metering in the original Digital Rebel was less than adequate, but it makes the XTi look very bad.  The XTi is a piece of junk.  Search google for &#8220;Digital Rebel flash metering&#8221;.  You can offset the problems with a good flash unit, but don&#8217;t go cheap on it.  My next camera will probably be a Nikon D90.<br />
Good luck with yours, I hope you like it.  If you take outdoor photos, it will be fine.  Indoor, you will be left wanting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

