<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Book Review: The Marketing Playbook</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stormyscorner.com/2009/05/book-review-the-marketing-playbook.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stormyscorner.com/2009/05/book-review-the-marketing-playbook.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 12:13:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: stormy</title>
		<link>http://stormyscorner.com/2009/05/book-review-the-marketing-playbook.html/comment-page-1#comment-711</link>
		<dc:creator>stormy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 07:09:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stormyscorner.com/2009/05/book-review-the-marketing-playbook.html#comment-711</guid>
		<description>The best-of-both plays would play to our strength - we have a lot of great product people. I&#039;d argue that it needs to be even more different than desktop though. Like a whole new interface for netbooks that&#039;s better than the cell phone interface and better than the desktop space. Something in between.
Play #4 isn&#039;t about improving what you have, it&#039;s about something completely new.
I do agree, just trying to prove we have an easy to use desktop puts us in a hard to win drag race.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The best-of-both plays would play to our strength &#8211; we have a lot of great product people. I&#8217;d argue that it needs to be even more different than desktop though. Like a whole new interface for netbooks that&#8217;s better than the cell phone interface and better than the desktop space. Something in between.<br />
Play #4 isn&#8217;t about improving what you have, it&#8217;s about something completely new.<br />
I do agree, just trying to prove we have an easy to use desktop puts us in a hard to win drag race.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Germán Póo-Caamaño</title>
		<link>http://stormyscorner.com/2009/05/book-review-the-marketing-playbook.html/comment-page-1#comment-710</link>
		<dc:creator>Germán Póo-Caamaño</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 16:49:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stormyscorner.com/2009/05/book-review-the-marketing-playbook.html#comment-710</guid>
		<description>I do prefer the fourth one.  Something in between &quot;The destkop for the hacker in you&quot; and &quot;The desktop for smart people&quot;.
People think Linux is hard to use, even when you show them it is not, but sometimes you open a terminal, or change your workspace (which does not exist in other operating systems by default), etc.  Trying to prove he have a easy to use desktop, it is like to fight the first one.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do prefer the fourth one.  Something in between &#8220;The destkop for the hacker in you&#8221; and &#8220;The desktop for smart people&#8221;.<br />
People think Linux is hard to use, even when you show them it is not, but sometimes you open a terminal, or change your workspace (which does not exist in other operating systems by default), etc.  Trying to prove he have a easy to use desktop, it is like to fight the first one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

