<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Would You Do It Again for Free? on Stormy Peters</title><link>https://stormyscorner.com/categories/would-you-do-it-again-for-free/</link><description>Recent content in Would You Do It Again for Free? on Stormy Peters</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 15:13:38 -0700</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://stormyscorner.com/categories/would-you-do-it-again-for-free/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Book Review: The Starfish and the Spider &amp; Open source software organizations and money</title><link>https://stormyscorner.com/blog/book-review-the-starfish-and-the-spider-open-source-software-organizations-and-money/</link><pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 15:13:38 -0700</pubDate><guid>https://stormyscorner.com/blog/book-review-the-starfish-and-the-spider-open-source-software-organizations-and-money/</guid><description>&lt;p>&lt;a href="https://www.amazon.com/dp/1591841836/ref=as_li_ss_til?tag=stormysblog-20&amp;amp;camp=0&amp;amp;creative=0&amp;amp;linkCode=as4&amp;amp;creativeASIN=1591841836&amp;amp;adid=1KNXSBXMSF12A49Q54XB&amp;amp;" rel="noopener">The Starfish and the Spider&lt;/a> compares two types of organizational structures. Spider organizations have a central command structure, like a CEO. If you detach one of the spider&amp;rsquo;s legs from the head, the leg can no longer function. It is not autonomous. Starfish organizations have very distributed command structures. Cut off a leg and it will continue to function and will even grow other legs and turn into its own starfish. Each type of organization has its benefits and drawbacks and each are useful at different times. One key to success is understanding what type of organization you are in, its strengths and weaknesses and when you might want to act more like the other type. Hybrids are also possible. For example, GE Â under Jack Welsh transitioned from a spider to a spider/starfish. Traditional companies tend to be more like spider organizations and open source software projects tend to be more like starfish.&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>Forking an open source project: regaining internal motivation</title><link>https://stormyscorner.com/blog/forking-an-open-source-project-regaining-internal-motivation/</link><pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2010 09:02:56 -0700</pubDate><guid>https://stormyscorner.com/blog/forking-an-open-source-project-regaining-internal-motivation/</guid><description>&lt;p>Can forking a free software project enable you to regain your internal motivation to work on a project? My current theory is that if you work on free software, then you get paid to work on it and then you get laid off, that you would work on a different project. Because the first one is no longer good enough to get paid, then it must not be good enough to work on for free.&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>Unexpected rewards are better than expected rewards</title><link>https://stormyscorner.com/blog/unexpected-rewards-are-better-than-expected-rewards/</link><pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 15:36:23 -0700</pubDate><guid>https://stormyscorner.com/blog/unexpected-rewards-are-better-than-expected-rewards/</guid><description>&lt;p>Since I&amp;rsquo;ve started talking about &lt;a href="https://stormyscorner.com/would-you-do-it-again-for-free" rel="noopener">Would you do it again for free?&lt;/a>, I&amp;rsquo;ve been very interested in any studies that show how extrinsic rewards change intrinsic rewards. The theory is that external rewards can replace your internal values to the point that you&amp;rsquo;ll no longer do what you valued without external payment or reward of some type.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>&lt;a href="http://www.spring.org.uk/2009/10/how-rewards-can-backfire-and-reduce-motivation.php" rel="noopener">This study&lt;/a> showed that unexpected rewards are better than expected rewards. They took kids who liked to draw and put them in three groups. One group was:&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>Supporting free software with grant money</title><link>https://stormyscorner.com/blog/supporting-free-software-with-grant-money/</link><pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 08:00:11 -0700</pubDate><guid>https://stormyscorner.com/blog/supporting-free-software-with-grant-money/</guid><description>&lt;p>I recently started investigating how GNOME could fund projects with grant money. Will Ross sent me an email with a lot of good information and I&amp;rsquo;d like to share his experience with others in the open source software community.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>*&lt;img src="https://stormyscorner.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/6a00d8341c153053ef01156ec8355d970c-320wi.jpeg" alt="DSCF0535a" loading="lazy">*&lt;em>Will Ross is a project manager with &lt;a href="https://www.minformatics.com" rel="noopener">Mendocino Informatics&lt;/a>, a small healthcare technology consulting firm in Mendocino County, California. Prior to Mendocino Informatics, Will was CTO for a consortium of nonprofit community clinics, and before that worked on the network infrastructure teams for two Bay Area dot-coms that &lt;em>didn&amp;rsquo;t&lt;/em> fail (Organic Online &amp;amp; LoudCloud). Will spent the 90s as CIO for a mail order company and writing SQL queries for a multinational manufacturing company.&lt;/em>&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>Companies: fostering or controlling communities? An interview with Kim Weins</title><link>https://stormyscorner.com/blog/companies-fostering-or-controlling-communities-an-interview-with-kim-weins/</link><pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 15:07:46 -0700</pubDate><guid>https://stormyscorner.com/blog/companies-fostering-or-controlling-communities-an-interview-with-kim-weins/</guid><description>&lt;p>*&lt;img src="https://stormyscorner.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/6a00d8341c153053ef01116901a8f0970c-320pi.jpeg" alt="IMG_3907" loading="lazy">
&lt;a href="https://www.openlogic.com/blogs/author/kim/" rel="noopener">Kim Weins&lt;/a> is the Senior VP of Marketing at &lt;a href="https://openlogic.com" rel="noopener">OpenLogic&lt;/a>. Kim spent three years as a principal in CMO Strategy Group and helped companies such as Atomz (acquired by WebSideStory), TuVox and
RedSeal to significantly accelerate their marketing efforts. Prior to CMO Strategy Group, she was at PeopleSoft where she was responsible for driving PeopleSoft&amp;rsquo;s CRM business strategy.
*&lt;/p>
&lt;p>I had lunch with Kim Weins from OpenLogic. We had an interesting discussion about open source companies and how they can either dominate or foster communities. In addition, we also talked about what it&amp;rsquo;s like for an open source software developer to work for an open source company. She works with many open source developers on a contract basis as well as many open source companies on a partner basis. Her insights were interesting.&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>Does money kill good motivations?</title><link>https://stormyscorner.com/blog/does-money-kill-good-motivations/</link><pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 06:28:02 -0700</pubDate><guid>https://stormyscorner.com/blog/does-money-kill-good-motivations/</guid><description>&lt;p>I get asked a lot about my &amp;ldquo;Would you do it again for free?&amp;rdquo; talk. (&amp;ldquo;Would you do it again for free&amp;rdquo; was about the question, if you take developers that are working on open source software for free and you pay them, if you stop paying
them, will they still work on open source software?Â  This was the topic of my keynote at &lt;a href="https://guadec.org/" rel="noopener">GUADEC&lt;/a>, &lt;a href="https://linux.conf.au/programme/keynotes" rel="noopener">LinuxConf Australia&lt;/a>, and &lt;a href="https://www.socallinuxexpo.org/" rel="noopener">SCALE&lt;/a> - the talk evolved over time. The next step is to communicate how companies can work effectively with communities.)&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>Social Norms vs Market Norms</title><link>https://stormyscorner.com/blog/social-norms-vs-market-norms/</link><pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 21:01:00 -0700</pubDate><guid>https://stormyscorner.com/blog/social-norms-vs-market-norms/</guid><description>&lt;p>Social norms govern whether you are willing to help a friend move or cook dinner for your family. Market norms govern what you are willing to do for how much money. In an experiment to show how social norms vary from market norms, &lt;a href="https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/006135323X?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;tag=stormysblog-20&amp;amp;linkCode=as2&amp;amp;camp=1789&amp;amp;creative=9325&amp;amp;creativeASIN=006135323X" rel="noopener">Dan Ariely&lt;/a> created a computer task where volunteers had to drag circles into boxes. He then divided his volunteers into 3 groups.&lt;/p>
&lt;ul>
&lt;li>Group 1 got $5.00.&lt;/li>
&lt;li>Group 2 got either 50 cents or 10 cents.&lt;/li>
&lt;li>Group 3 was asked to do him a favor.&lt;/li>
&lt;/ul>
&lt;p>Not surprisingly, group 1 - the highest paid group - outperformed group 2, but group 3 - the volunteer group - outperformed them all.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>